Mongols Case Judge Quits

May 27, 2015

All Posts, News

Mongols Case Judge Quits

Federal District Judge Otis D. Wright II abruptly quit the Mongols Nation case yesterday afternoon. Prosecutors in the case, who were forewarned of his decision, are seeking to convict the club as a racketeering enterprise and seize the club’s name and unique logo.

The racketeering case was suggested to prosecutors by Judge Wright who was then “randomly” selected to preside over it. The trial was scheduled to begin next Tuesday, June 2.

United States of America versus Mongols Nation An Unincorporated Association had already begun to attract attention from the national press. The case is newsworthy because the Mongols insignia, which lawyers call indicia, are a special kind of trademark called a “collective membership marks.” Trademarks do not enjoy full First Amendment protection but collective membership marks do. Generally, the Mongols marks would be protected from government censorship unless the government could prove that wearing a Mongols patch was a “true threat.” Both Wright and prosecutors hoped to defeat the First Amendment by proving the Mongols club was an ongoing criminal enterprise and that both its word mark and picture mark were forfeitable assets.

The United States has been trying to seize the Mongols indicia since 2008. While announcing racketeering charges against 79 Mongols in a case called United States versus Cavazos et al., former United States Attorney Thomas P. O’Brien announced:

“The racketeering indictment seeks the forfeiture of the trademarked ‘Mongols’ name, which is part of the ‘patch’ members wear on their motorcycle jackets.

“In addition to pursuing the criminal charges set forth in the indictment, for the first time ever, we are seeking to forfeit the intellectual property of a gang,” O’Brien said. “The name ‘Mongols,’ which is part of the gang’s ‘patch’ that members wear on their motorcycle jackets, was trademarked by the gang. The indictment alleges that this trademark is subject to forfeiture. We have filed papers seeking a court order that will prevent gang members from using or displaying the name ‘Mongols.’ If the court grants our request for this order, then if any law enforcement officer sees a Mongol wearing his patch, he will be authorized to stop that gang member and literally take the jacket right off his back.”

Plea Deals

The Mongols Nation trial would have lasted at least three months. When Wright openly encouraged Assistant United States Attorneys Christopher Brunwin and Steven Welk to pursue a racketeering indictment against the club as a whole, he assumed the prosecutors could simply present jurors, or him, with plea deals signed by defendants. Wright and prosecutors thought those confessions, signed by men desperate to get out of jail and get on with their lives, would be all the proof anyone would need to find that the entire motorcycle club was a racket. The assumption may say more about Brunwin’s, Welk’s and Wright’s competence in the law than the case could ever say about the Mongols’ alleged criminality.

Wright started looking for a way out of the hot mess he had created when Mongols attorneys Joe Yanny and Elliot Min insisted that the club had the right to confront its accusers. The defense wanted to cross examine the former Mongols about their confessions and that threatened to open the Pandora’s Box that hides the evils of federal criminal justice.

During a sometimes bizarre, 90 minute hearing Wright hypothesized how he might rule if he stuck with the case.

Wright said that if he remained in charge he would be inclined to admit numerous plea agreements coerced out of defendants in the 2008 Cavazos case, even though such agreements are generally considered to be hearsay. He thought the agreements would be important evidence because of their “voluntariness.”

When Yanny argued that “Many if not most of these (potential) witnesses are indeed innocent because they got a better deal than they were facing” by agreeing to the plea deal, Wright responded that innocent people don’t take plea deals.

The Cavazos Pleas

In fact, all the defendants in the Cavazos racketeering case were overcharged and virtually every defendant pled guilty to “conspiring to conduct and participate in the conduct of the affairs of the Mongols through a pattern of racketeering activity.” They pled guilty because that racketeering crime carried a penalty of 20 years in prison and only prosecutors, not judges, had the power to reduce the sentence. “Conspiring to conduct and participate in the conduct of the affairs of the Mongols” actually meant a wide spectrum of acts that ranged from serving as a club officer to selling drugs or guns to an undercover agent while a member of the club.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which investigated the Mongols, has always used entrapments to make racketeering cases against motorcycle clubs. In 1991, ATF Agent Steve Martin begged a member of the Warlocks Motorcycle Club in Florida to supply him with guns so he would not be murdered by “Columbians.” Gun running then became one of the principal charges leveled against that club. In 2007, a confidential informant begged a Mongol named William Owens for methamphetamine to  repay a debt. If he couldn’t obtain the drug, the informant claimed, he would be killed. So Owens, a recovering meth abuser, got his club brother the crank the informant claimed he needed to live. And, more than a year later Owens was charged with conspiracy to distribute and distribution of that drug. The amount the informant begged for was not arbitrary. It was just enough to ensure that Owens would face a mandatory ten year sentence. It was an example of what lawyers call “sentence entrapment.”  So Owens could either take a plea deal or face up to 30 years in prison as a drug dealing racketeer.

In actual praxis, except for the very affluent, federal prosecutors act as judges, jurors and executioners. Virtually no one beats the system. In 2013, 97 percent of all federal cases were resolved with a plea bargain. More than 90 percent of those who insist on inconveniencing the federal courts by demanding a trial are punished with a guilty verdict.

In an article about plea bargains in The New York Review of Books last November, U.S. District Judge Jed S. Rakoff wrote that mandatory sentences, like the mandatory sentence for racketeering or the mandatory drug sentence Owens faced, “provide prosecutors with weapons to bludgeon defendants into effectively coerced plea bargains. In the majority of criminal cases, a defense lawyer only meets her client when or shortly after the client is arrested, so that, at the outset, she is at a considerable informational disadvantage to the prosecutor. If, as is very often the case (despite the constitutional prohibition of “excessive bail”), bail is set so high that the client is detained, the defense lawyer has only modest opportunities, within the limited visiting hours and other arduous restrictions imposed by most jails, to interview her client and find out his version of the facts.”

The Colloquy

Other federal judges laud the “plea bargaining system” because of the efficiency with which it sends people to prison. Most of the defendants in the Cavazos case remained locked up, awaiting a trial that never came, until they “confessed” that the Mongols Motorcycle Club was a racket. The logic is loony. The reasoning is that a dog that is beaten until he learns to quack is unquestionably a duck.

In yesterday’s hearing, Wright cited the lengthy “outline” of questions contained in the Benchbook for U.S. District Court. Judges – what coconspirators in the federal judge racket call the Guilty Plea Colloquy – as proof that all the guilty pleas he accepted were genuine. The reading of the colloquy at plea hearings may be the most despicable public ritual in America:

“How far did you advance in school?”

“High School.”

“And, are you aware that you may be giving up certain of your rights, like the right to vote or own a gun or serve on a jury?”

“Yeah, sure.”

The reading of the colloquy always takes at least ten minutes. Judge Wright said yesterday that the answer to the final question of the colloquy must always be true because he took up to “a half hour” with each defendant.

“And are you in fact actually guilty?”

At that recurring moment in American justice, the defendant almost always turns to his public defender, as if at the last moment his public defender might save him, as if his public defender would bother to save him even if he could, and the two always exchange whispers before the accused confesses, “Uh, yeah. I’m guilty.”

Yesterday, Wright also characterized the men who had signed the Cavazos’ plea agreements as “pigs.”

Wright said that witnesses who might testify that their formal confessions were not voluntary might face additional charges of perjury.

You Lose

Then the judge finally ran out of angry words and quit the case.

Yanny formally asked Wright to withdraw 467 days ago, on Valentine’s Day, 2014.

That motion cited Wright’s conduct when previous Mongols’ attorney Bob Bernstein asked for a dismissal of the case on October 21, 2013

Wright characterized the Mongols’ bylaws, which forbid criminal activity, as “a joke, and you know it. I am surprised you even mentioned it. This is a criminal enterprise as evidenced by the admissions of same by no fewer than 40 people who appeared before me. I can’t speak to the other 40 who appeared before Judge Carter. This is a dangerous enterprise.”

“You are saying that it is no different than them having perhaps having been Lutheran and they are of doing all these criminal things and it is just coincidental that some of them were Lutheran; right,” the judge raged. “It is not the same
thing, is it? They are operating under the banner of the Mongols. It is that name, that reputation, that intimidation factor which enables them to do what they do, isn’t it?

Bernstein got as far as, “I can’t,” before Wright interrupted him.

“Go like that.”

“I can’t answer that, your Honor.”

“I can,” Wright said. “I have seen them, alright. They have all been here. I have seen them. And that is why they are fighting so hard to hang on to those colors. Those colors mean something…. If that organization is convicted, its interest in those marks is forfeitable to the government; right.”

Bernstein said, “I don’t agree. That is the rub.”

“You lose,” Wright told Bernstein and denied the motion for dismissal.

You Win

Yesterday, Wright confessed at length to a mostly empty courtroom, “Any reasonable person would have reason to doubt my impartiality…. I’ve got to be impartial…. Did you think I was in the pocket of the government…. I have to be biased in favor of a criminal defendant…. I care about how this court is perceived by the public…. I’m trying to gracefully move out of this thing…. I’m going to recuse myself from this case…. It looks horrible. You win. I am going to vacate the hearing on June 1 and the trial beginning on June 2.

The new presiding judge in the case will be the Honorable John Arnold Kronstadt. Kronstadt graduated from Cornell University and Yale Law School. He was appointed to the federal bench by President Obama on January 5, 2011 and confirmed by the Senate three months later. He had previously served as a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge and as an attorney in private practice. One of his specialties during his 24 years in private practice was copyright law.

No official in the United States District Court for the Central District of California could offer an estimate of what the Mongols Nation case has cost tax payers so far.

, , , , ,

33 Responses to “Mongols Case Judge Quits”

  1. Shyster Says:

    Fuck You Otis.


  2. Ol'LadyRider Says:

    I think this may be really good news. I’m earnestly praying that it is.

  3. Clutch Says:

    Wow! There is hope. Thanks for keeping us posted, Rebel.

  4. Wolfenlover Says:

    Evidently enough people convinced Wright that he was just Stupid & could get
    himself hung/jailed for being Stupid!
    Here’s hoping this next judge isn’t also a mental-deficient jurist!
    BEST of luck to the MONGOLS NATION! (Too bad one o’ ya’ll don’t win th’

    RESPECTS Rebel & to the regulars

  5. Austin Says:

    Education is the Only Solution
    Remarks of U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Global Education Summit

    Thank you all for working to guarantee every child, in every corner of the globe, the universal right to education. As all of you know, we live in a hyper-connected, highly inter-dependent world, where knowledge is the most important currency.

    That makes education more important than ever before. And it makes your work the most meaningful work that anyone can do.

    Nothing could make this clearer than Malala Yousafzai’s remarkable, moving address to the United Nations last month. “We realize the importance of light,” she said, “when we see darkness. We realize the importance of our voice when we are silenced.”

    And, when the Taliban came for her and her classmates, she said, and I quote: “We realized the importance of pens and books, when we saw the guns.”

    Malala was speaking on her 16th birthday—a day the extremists tried to stop her from ever reaching. She urged the world community to “wage a global struggle against illiteracy, poverty and terrorism.”

    “Education,” she said, “is the only solution.”

    The Honorable John Arnold Kronstadt seems like a reasonable human being and a most excellent successor to Federal District Judge Otis D. Wright II.

    We shall watch and see eh?

  6. Paladin Says:

    Otis no longer on the case is like a breath of fresh air. Unfortunately, this charlatan is still working within the system and is perfectly capable of unjustly ruining the lives of many others.

    The fact that Otis wasn’t forcefully removed from the case by the applet court, speaks volumes about the integrity of this Country’s judicial system.

    Long May You Ride (to those that deserve to),


  7. Phuquehed Says:

    I’m with Shyster – Fuck you Otis, you corrupt piece of shit.

  8. Calvin, John Says:

    Meet the new Boss, same as the old Boss. Well, hopefully not but probably so.


  9. feds a joke Says:

    Funny the Mongols are supposed to have around 700 members across the U.S the feds were able to infiltrate the organisation and bring charges against 79 members which is just over 10% of the membership so it is ridiculous for them to say it is an organised crime group.

    If that was the case they would have been able to bring charges against way more than 10-12% of the membership.

  10. David Baldwin Says:

    Mr. Otis thinks he’s in the right. Unfortunately he doesn’t make the connection that he has just been forced to swallow his own “Plea deal.” He didn’t want to quit the case, but the consequences of going to trial were potentially much worse than a giving up, recusing himself.
    Innocent people plead guilty most of the time. Going to trial to defend yourself costs more than paying the fine. Simple economics.
    It is true that when you go to trial, you are usually found guilty. In my role with JAG in the Navy, we wouldn’t forward you to trial unless we had what we needed to convict. Don’t go to trial unless you have everything you need to win.
    David Baldwin
    CPO, USN ret.

  11. FF Says:


    Hey I saw your post last night— sometime this year we gotta try and do a ride in Nathan Bedford Forrest Park!


  12. Road Whore Says:

    “Justice?” Makes me literally want to fucking weep.

    Ride Free while you still can.

    Free the Waco Bikers.

  13. popeye Says:

    This is good news. Maybe this case will begin to unravel and be exposed for the witch hunt it is. A obama appointed liberal judge cant hurt either

  14. Meh Says:

    Had Wright not withdrawn under pressure, what were some (realistic) possible negative outcomes?

    Reason I ask is this won’t be the last time a judge cannot resist revealing his prejudice against defendants.

  15. VAGO 1%er Says:


  16. Mike184 Says:

    Well, on Paper the new guy sounds at least properly educated. Good luck. It’s good news for the time being.

  17. Base Says:

    When these people are exposed for what they are it brings into question all his past cases. How many people has this ass hole locked up because of his bigotry?

    Perhaps Karma has a special event planed for him, such as Otis goes on a African safari during the Mountain Gorilla mating seasons and he becomes the love interest of an overly aggressive Grey Back!!

  18. oldskewl Says:

    So these guys still remain in jail awaiting trial? The last year and a half are down the shitter?


  19. Asskiller Says:

    @oldskewl – Looks like it. The Leviathan crushes where it squats.

  20. Dan B Says:

    What ever happened to standing up and taking your lumps. I know a lot of 1%’ers and every one of them are stand up guys. But this bullshit of creating the situation then dealing the lumps is bullshit. Our justice system is fucked up and broken from top to bottom. I believe the majority of judges and prosecutors are the worst criminals of all. All their behind closed doors deals that send people to prison at best for a lot longer than they should be. I’m not saying everyone is innocent but let the punishment fit the crime. They’re (prosecutors and judges) are nothing but a bunch of pencil pushing bullies who probably spent their youth getting their asses kicked.

  21. Primo Says:

    The reasoning is that a dog that is beaten until he learns to quack is unquestionably a duck.

  22. cody Says:

    Fuck that punk!!!


  23. Centurion Says:

    based upon Operation Greylord, in which a number of judges were accused of taking bribes to fix cases,that makes being a judge A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE. Not long ago, a judge was being paid nice kickback fees to sentence underage first time offenders to lenghty sentences within a private facility, you know, private jail. Well, that judge broke the law, that same judge and a couple of others broke the law, while wearing that black robe, that black robe, signifies a criminal enterprise. Those who wear the black robe will likely engage in criminal activity.

    Shall we discuss the FEDS who are taking bribes now?

  24. Mike184 Says:

    Speaking of all that, what is the deal with the guy in the LA county Jail???? The one where the bullet went thru his dads arm, out the door all the way around the block, turned around and then came back and went in the back of the SWAT guys head????

  25. TC Says:

    Couldn’t ask for a better lawyer than Joe Yanny! Only thing bugs me about the guy is, despite all the testalying cops and corrupt judges he’s battled over the years, he somehow still has some faith left in our criminal injustice system. Me, I don’t! Hoping he adds this one to his long list of cases no one else could have won. Go Joe!!!

  26. cody Says:

    Fuck that punk!!!


  27. Jim666 Says:

    I would have to point out to the federal assholes that the only thing anyone could wear that could possibly be seen as a threat would be a bomb of dynamite.
    I can hardly believe that any article of clothing / patch could warrant a threat period, Fuck the federal scum

  28. swampy Says:

    Hopefully this will turn into good news. However, I believe the taxpayers are gonna’ get bilked for at least a couple of mil more. Best of luck to the Mongol Nation.

    @FF, greatest soldier produced by either side of that War. He got a very bad rap from the siege, and capture, of Fort Pillow. Forrest had sent in terms guaranteeing quarter giving as he usually did. The black troops and Tennessee “tories” responded by breaking in to their own commissary, getting drunk on the liquor stores and taunting “Critter Company.” Bedford Forrest lost a lot of good men trying to take the Fort. Also, having 29 horses shot out from under him during the course of the War; it would be at Fort Pillow where he would lose his “all time” favorite charger, “Rodrick.” One tough motherfucker…. Don’t waste time reading a lot of junk written about him. Here’s the definitive work:

  29. Phuquehed Says:

    @FF – Hit up my e-mail at the bottom of my site. I think I answered you when you said this in another article somewhere, but I can’t find it, so we’ll figure something out and not cludge up Rebel’s site figuring something out.

  30. ocmouse22 Says:

    About fucking time that piece of shot walked away

  31. Martinez Says:

    @Mike184. -Martinez next Court date June 3rd..

  32. Annastinaa Says:

    “And that is why they are fighting so hard to hang on to those colors. Those colors mean something…. ….””

    You’re damned right they do. It’s coming down to the wire to defend them for real. New judge … Waco’s fiasco …

    It’s gettin’ spooky.


  1. Mongols in peril as feds target biker club’s logo - Middle East Post | Middle East Post - June 1, 2015

    […] to the Mongols, they can do it to anybody,” Donald Charles Davis, a biker expert who blogs at Aging Rebel, told the Wall Street Journal. “The idea seems to be that you can ban motorcycle clubs by […]

Leave a Reply